If you have literally any form of health issue (migraines, heart disease, asthma, autoimmunity, chronic fatigue, etc, etc, etc) or are at any form of “high risk” you especially need to:

  1. Take off any mask you may be wearing  
  2. Watch the video below
  3. Read this entire post

Featuring [exceedingly qualified OSHA training experts] Tammy Clark and Kristen Meghan:

https://www.bitchute.com/video/FltFj9wc2VVq/

Kristen Meghan credentials:

  • OSHA certified trainer
  • OSHA 10 and 30hr
  • Former DOD OSHA liaison
  • DECON site manager
  • Sub Specialties in Public Health
  • Sat on Infectious Control Boards
  • Tested over 10K masks and respirators

TAMMY K. CLARK background:

  • Operates a medical and health, plus occupational safety and health service consulting agency

ALSO:

A Review Of Science Relevant To COVID-19 Social Policy And Why Face Masks Don’t Work  (well referenced)

https://www.technocracy.news/censored-a-review-of-science-relevant-to-covid-19-social-policy-and-why-face-masks-dont-work/

Masks Do Not Inhibit Viral Spread (extremely important video…try to ignore Mercola’s annoying interruptions)

https://articles.mercola.com/sites/articles/archive/2020/07/19/are-face-masks-effective.aspx

OCLA [Ontario Civil Liberties Association] Scientists Ask WHO to Retract Recommendation Advising Use of Face Masks in General Population…based on verifiable (a.k.a., real), objective SCIENCE

http://ocla.ca/ocla-letter-who/

Masks — The Most Controversial COVID-19 Debate?

https://articles.mercola.com/sites/articles/archive/2020/07/29/do-masks-help-with-coronavirus.aspx

Ohio State Representative A. Nino Vitale demonstrating hypo-oxygenation effects of masks:

https://pvsheridan.com/VitaleTests-oxygen-DANGER_mask.mp4

MASK TEST SHOWS HOW  MASK WEARING GENERATES DANGEROUS CO2 LEVELS IN THE BODY:

https://www.bitchute.com/video/ypLjmXQoLygi/

Respiratory virus shedding in exhaled breath and efficacy of face masks [see screen shot of study and conclusions below]:

https://www.nature.com/articles/s41591-020-0843-2

https://wwwnc.cdc.gov/eid/article/26/5/19-0994_article

ABOVE STUDY CONCLUSIONS:

“In our systematic review, we identified 10 RCTs [Random Controlled Trials] that reported estimates of the effectiveness of face masks in reducing laboratory-confirmed influenza virus infections in the community from literature published during 1946–July 27, 2018. In pooled analysis, we found no significant reduction in influenza transmission with the use of face masks.”

“There is limited evidence for their effectiveness in preventing influenza virus transmission either when worn by the infected person for source control or when worn by uninfected persons to reduce exposure. Our systematic review found no significant effect of face masks on transmission of laboratory-confirmed influenza.”

“We did not find evidence that surgical-type face masks are effective in reducing laboratory-confirmed influenza transmission, either when worn by infected persons (source control) or by persons in the general community to reduce their susceptibility.”

“Wearing a mask…offers little, if any, protection from infection” – Harvard doctors:

https://www.nexusnewsfeed.com/article/science-futures/wearing-a-mask-offers-little-if-any-protection-from-infection-harvard-doctors/

Masks Cause Damage: Study Reveals Mask-Hypoxia-Blood Clot Connection:

https://www.sciencedaily.com/releases/2018/08/180802115657.htm

https://thefreedomarticles.com/hypoxia-blood-clot-connection-study-cdc-who-study/

QUOTE BY ANTHONY FAUCI:

“There’s no reason to be walking around with a mask. When you’re in the middle of an outbreak, wearing a mask might make people feel a little better and it might even block a droplet, but it’s not providing the perfect protection that people think it is. And often there are unintended consequences – people keep fiddling with the mask and they keep touching their face.”   ~Anthony Fauci

Surgeon general wants you to stop buying masks to protect yourself from coronavirus: ‘They are NOT effective’:

https://www.marketwatch.com/story/surgeon-general-wants-you-to-stop-buying-masks-to-protect-yourself-from-coronavirus-they-are-not-effective-2020-03-01

STUDY:

Why Face Masks Don’t Work: A Revealing Review

October 18, 2016

by John Hardie, BDS, MSc, PhD, FRCDC

NOTE:  the original article has been removed from its original publication site, but has been reproduced at the following link: 

http://www.freerepublic.com/focus/f-chat/3859757/posts

The Inadequacies Between 2004 and 2016 at least a dozen research or review articles have been published on the inadequacies of face masks. 5,6,11,17,19,20,21,25,26,27,28,31 All agree that the poor facial fit and limited filtration characteristics of face masks make them unable to prevent the wearer inhaling airborne particles. In their well-referenced 2011 article on respiratory protection for healthcare workers, Drs. Harriman and Brosseau conclude that, “facemasks will not protect against the inhalation of aerosols.” 11 Following their 2015 literature review, Dr. Zhou and colleagues stated, “There is a lack of substantiated evidence to support claims that facemasks protect either patient or surgeon from infectious contamination.” 25 In the same year Dr. R. MacIntyre noted that randomized controlled trials of facemasks failed to prove their efficacy. 5



THE MUCH BALLYHOOED and mandated use of cloth, surgical and other masks such as the much sought-after N95 respirators by the general public are not remotely supported by the scientific evidence at hand:

“Out of 2862 randomize participants: 2371 completed the study and accounted for 5180 HCW-seasons… Among outpatient healthcare personnel, N95 respirators vs medical masks as worn by participants in this trial resulted in no significant difference in the incidence of laboratory confirmed influenza.”

https://jamanetwork.com/journals/jama/fullarticle/2749214

https://onlinelibrary.wiley.com/doi/epdf/10.1111/jebm.12381

“A total of six RCT’s [randomized controlled trials] involving 9171 participants were included. There were no statistically significant differences in preventing laboratory confirmed influenza, Laboratory confirmed respiratory viral infections, laboratory confirmed respiratory infection, and influenza like illness using N95 respirators and surgical masks. Meta-analysis indicated a protective effect of N95 respirators against laboratory confirmed to bacterial colonization (RR = 0.58, 95% CI 0.43-0.78).  The use of N95 respirators compared with surgical masks is not associated with a lower risk of laboratory confirmed influenza.”

Results: The rates of all infection outcomes were highest in the cloth mask arm, with the rate of ILI statistically significantly higher in the cloth mask arm (relative risk (RR)=13.00, 95% CI 1.69 to 100.07) compared with the medical mask arm. Cloth masks also had significantly higher rates of ILI compared with the control arm. An analysis by mask use showed ILI (RR=6.64, 95% CI 1.45 to 28.65) and laboratory-confirmed virus (RR=1.72, 95% CI 1.01 to 2.94) were significantly higher in the cloth masks group compared with the medical masks group. Penetration of cloth masks by particles was almost 97% and medical masks 44%.              

Conclusions: “This study is the first RCT of cloth masks, and the results caution against the use of cloth masks. This is an important finding to inform occupational health and safety. Moisture retention, reuse of cloth masks and poor filtration may result in increased risk of infection. Further research is needed to inform the widespread use of cloth masks globally. However, as a precautionary measure, cloth masks should not be recommended for HCWs, particularly in high-risk situations, and guidelines need to be updated.”

https://pubmed.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/25903751/

https://wwwnc.cdc.gov/eid/article/26/5/19-0994_article

From the above CDC article:

Face Masks

Figure 2. Meta-analysis of risk ratios for the effect of face mask use with or without enhanced hand hygiene on laboratory-confirmed influenza from 10 randomized controlled trials with >6,500 participants. A) Face mask…

“In our systematic review, we identified 10 RCTs that reported estimates of the effectiveness of face masks in reducing laboratory-confirmed influenza virus infections in the community from literature published during 1946–July 27, 2018. In pooled analysis, we found no significant reduction in influenza transmission with the use of face masks (RR 0.78, 95% CI 0.51–1.20; I2 = 30%, p = 0.25) (Figure 2). One study evaluated the use of masks among pilgrims from Australia during the Hajj pilgrimage and reported no major difference in the risk for laboratory-confirmed influenza virus infection in the control or mask group (33). Two studies in university settings assessed the effectiveness of face masks for primary protection by monitoring the incidence of laboratory-confirmed influenza among student hall residents for 5 months (9,10). The overall reduction in ILI or laboratory-confirmed influenza cases in the face mask group was not significant in either studies (9,10). Study designs in the 7 household studies were slightly different: 1 study provided face masks and P2 respirators for household contacts only (34), another study evaluated face mask use as a source control for infected persons only (35), and the remaining studies provided masks for the infected persons as well as their close contacts (1113,15,17). None of the household studies reported a significant reduction in secondary laboratory-confirmed influenza virus infections in the face mask group (1113,15,17,34,35). Most studies were underpowered because of limited sample size, and some studies also reported suboptimal adherence in the face mask group.

Disposable medical masks (also known as surgical masks) are loose-fitting devices that were designed to be worn by medical personnel to protect accidental contamination of patient wounds, and to protect the wearer against splashes or sprays of bodily fluids (36). There is limited evidence for their effectiveness in preventing influenza virus transmission either when worn by the infected person for source control or when worn by uninfected persons to reduce exposure. Our systematic review found no significant effect of face masks on transmission of laboratory-confirmed influenza.

We did not consider the use of respirators in the community. Respirators are tight-fitting masks that can protect the wearer from fine particles (37) and should provide better protection against influenza virus exposures when properly worn because of higher filtration efficiency. However, respirators, such as N95 and P2 masks, work best when they are fit-tested, and these masks will be in limited supply during the next pandemic. These specialist devices should be reserved for use in healthcare settings or in special subpopulations such as immunocompromised persons in the community, first responders, and those performing other critical community functions, as supplies permit.”

MORE ON THE DANGERS AND INEFFECTIVENESS OF MASKS WORN BY THE GENERAL PUBLIC

Face Masks Pose Serious Risks to the Healthy

by Russell Blaylock, MD (neurosurgeon):

Excerpt:

“Now that we have established that there is no scientific evidence necessitating the wearing of a face mask for prevention, are there dangers to wearing a face mask, especially for long periods? Several studies have indeed found significant problems with wearing such a mask. This can vary from headaches, to increased airway resistance, carbon dioxide accumulation, to hypoxia, all the way to serious life-threatening complications.

There is a difference between the N95 respirator mask and the surgical mask (cloth or paper mask) in terms of side effects. The N95 mask, which filters out 95% of particles with a median diameter >0.3 µm2 , because it impairs respiratory exchange (breathing) to a greater degree than a soft mask, and is more often associated with headaches. In one such study, researchers surveyed 212 healthcare workers (47 males and 165 females) asking about presence of headaches with N95 mask use, duration of the headaches, type of headaches and if the person had preexisting headaches.2

They found that about a third of the workers developed headaches with use of the mask, most had preexisting headaches that were worsened by the mask wearing, and 60% required pain medications for relief. As to the cause of the headaches, while straps and pressure from the mask could be causative, the bulk of the evidence points toward hypoxia and/or hypercapnia as the cause. That is, a reduction in blood oxygenation (hypoxia) or an elevation in blood C02 (hypercapnia). It is known that the N95 mask, if worn for hours, can reduce blood oxygenation as much as 20%, which can lead to a loss of consciousness, as happened to the hapless fellow driving around alone in his car wearing an N95 mask, causing him to pass out, and to crash his car and sustain injuries. I am sure that we have several cases of elderly individuals or any person with poor lung function passing out, hitting their head. This, of course, can lead to death.

A more recent study involving 159 healthcare workers aged 21 to 35 years of age found that 81% developed headaches from wearing a face mask.3   Some had pre-existing headaches that were precipitated by the masks. All felt like the headaches affected their work performance.

Unfortunately, no one is telling the frail elderly and those with lung diseases, such as COPD, emphysema or pulmonary fibrosis, of these dangers when wearing a facial mask of any kind–which can cause a severe worsening of lung function. This also includes lung cancer patients and people having had lung surgery, especially with partial resection or even the removal of a whole lung.

While most agree that the N95 mask can cause significant hypoxia and hypercapnia, another study of surgical masks found significant reductions in blood oxygen as well. In this study, researchers examined the blood oxygen levels in 53 surgeons using an oximeter. They measured blood oxygenation before surgery as well as at the end of surgeries.4 The researchers found that the mask reduced the blood oxygen levels (pa02) significantly. The longer the duration of wearing the mask, the greater the fall in blood oxygen levels.

The importance of these findings is that a drop in oxygen levels (hypoxia) is associated with an impairment in immunity. Studies have shown that hypoxia can inhibit the type of main immune cells used to fight viral infections called the CD4+ T-lymphocyte. This occurs because the hypoxia increases the level of a compound called hypoxia inducible factor-1 (HIF-1), which inhibits T-lymphocytes and stimulates a powerful immune inhibitor cell called the Tregs. This sets the stage for contracting any infection, including COVID-19 and making the consequences of that infection much graver. In essence, your mask may very well put you at an increased risk of infections and if so, having a much worse outcome.5,6,7″

PLEASE READ THE FULL (well referenced) ARTICLE HERE: 

https://journal.com.ph/news/nation/dr-blaylock-face-masks-pose-serious-risks-healthy

https://jamanetwork.com/journals/jama/fullarticle/2762694

From the above article:

“When Should a Mask Be Used?

Face masks should be used only by individuals who have symptoms of respiratory infection such as coughing, sneezing, or, in some cases, fever. Face masks should also be worn by health care workers, by individuals who are taking care of or are in close contact with people who have respiratory infections, or otherwise as directed by a doctor. Face masks should not be worn by healthy individuals to protect themselves from acquiring respiratory infection because there is no evidence to suggest that face masks worn by healthy individuals are effective in preventing people from becoming ill. Face masks should be reserved for those who need them because masks can be in short supply during periods of widespread respiratory infection. Because N95 respirators require special fit testing, they are not recommended for use by the general public.”

https://www.politico.com/video/2020/05/27/fauci-says-he-wears-mask-as-symbol-of-good-behavior-076208

Therein lies the real reason for mandated mask wearing, since—according to all available quality science– it has nothing to do with anything that actually helps you.  Anyone questioning this in social media, YouTube, or elsewhere—including doctors and legitimate scientists– is immediately and viciously suppressed:

The mask not meant to protect you or anyone else. It is almost exclusively a symbol of your obedience and unquestioning acquiescence to the bureaucratic dictates of the state. It also helps keep irrational fear and hysteria alive, while depriving those wearing them of the oxygen needed to think clearly (also helping to physiologically generate anxiety and fatigue through hypo-oxygenation). 

Fear, guilt, intimidation and shame are the socially imposed (and self-inflicting) weapons of control being used and encouraged to make sure the well behaved sheep keep herding themselves and one-another in the “right” direction.  I don’t think anyone is going to like where they end up.

https://www.reddit.com/r/gifs/comments/f6ty72/stay_where_you_are_and_hold_the_line/

https://www.bitchute.com/video/i4v8CXgjkEIU/

https://truthinmedia.com/face-masks-according-to-science/

“If I could live my life over again, I would devote it to proving that germs seek their natural habitat, diseased tissue, rather than being the cause of  the diseased tissue.

~ Dr. Rudolph Virchow, Father of Pathology

Conclusions:

The primary reason for mandating the wearing of face masks is to protect dental personnel from airborne pathogens. This review has established that face masks are incapable of providing such a level of protection. Unless the Centers for Disease Control and Prevention, national and provincial dental associations and regulatory agencies publicly admit this fact, they will be guilty of perpetuating a myth which will be a disservice to the dental profession and its patients…

WHAT TO DO?  HERE ARE SOME RESOURCES!

ACT NOW: Mandatory Masks Endanger Your Health and Your Liberties. Tell Your State and Local Officials To Make  Mask-Wearing Voluntary.

https://standforhealthfreedom.com/action/act-now-mandatory-masks-endanger-your-health/

Citizens For Free Speech

https://www.citizensforfreespeech.org

THE HEALTHY AMERICAN.ORG WEB SITE (Rich source of info concerning the constitutional, legal and health related issues associated with mask wearing mandates, and also steps you can take to legitimately fight this!  PLEASE SUPPORT THESE EFFORTS!):

https://www.thehealthyamerican.org/

Science Says Healthy People Should Not Wear Masks

https://www.thehealthyamerican.org/masks-dont-work

Article: CDC Mask Wearing Policy Not Supported by Science

SOMEONE SHOULD MASS PRODUCE THESE AND PASS THEM OUT TO STORE OWNERS:

“The general mask wearing obligation is unfounded, unlawful and psycho-socially irresponsible.” ~ Professor Martin Haditsch of The COVID-19 Extra-Parliamentary Inquiry Committee, Germany


March 23, 2020

I am an American constitutional lawyer – and I see our government using Covid-19 to take away our fundamental rights – Robert Barnes

https://libertyinternational.wordpress.com/2020/03/23/i-am-an-american-constitutional-lawyer-and-i-see-our-government-using-covid-19-to-take-away-our-fundamental-rights-ron-paul-institute/

“People shouldn’t be afraid of their government. Governments should be afraid of their people. Only when an awake public asserts their human liberties to protest the loss of their liberties will, then, governments quit using public health crises to seize power that does not belong to them. The answer to 1984 is still 1776.” ~ From the movie “V for Vendetta”

~ Nora

PS. Please consider donating to support my work and research. Thank you!